Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation ; 37(SUPPL 3):i357-i358, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1915722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) are at a particularly high risk of mortality from COVID-19. In this study, we investigated COVID-19 mortality in KRT patients in the first and second waves of the pandemic and potential reasons for any difference in mortality between the two waves. METHOD: Data from the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database (ERACODA) of KRT patients who presented between 1 March 2020 and 28 February 2021 with COVID-19 were analyzed. The cut-off for dividing the first and second waves was set for 1 August 2020. The primary study outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the pandemic waves and mortality with follow-up time starting at the date of presentation. Dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Among 3004 dialysis patients (1253 in the first and 1751 in the second wave), the 28-day mortality was 24.3% in the first wave and 19.6% in the second wave (P = .002). Compared with the first wave, in the second wave, identification of patients with limited to no symptoms was higher (14.3% versus 24.8%;P < .001), hospitalization was lower (71.3% versus 44.3%;P < .001), but in-hospital mortality was similar (30.4% versus 30.7%;P = .92) (Fig. 1). Crude hazard ratio (HR) for 28-day mortality in the second wave was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89). However, in a fully adjusted model, when correcting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, including the reason for COVID-19 screening and disease severity, the HR for mortality in the second wave was 0.93 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.79-1.10]. When follow-up was chosen to start at the date of first symptoms to account for possible lead-time bias, crude HR for 28-day mortality in the second wave was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.75-1.07) and the fully adjusted HR was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.81-1.18). Among 1035 kidney transplant recipients (475 in the first and 560 in the second wave), results were essentially similar except that patients in the second wave were younger (55.6 years versus 58.2 years;P = .002), and crude HR for 28-day mortality from the date of first symptoms was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.47-0.93), whereas the fully adjusted HR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.70-1.49). CONCLUSION: Among patients on KRT with COVID-19, 28-day mortality rates were lower in the second wave compared with the first wave. However, a greater proportion of patients with minimal symptoms, lead-time bias in dialysis patients, and younger age in kidney transplant recipients possibly explain the lower mortality during the second wave. Any improvement in patient management during the second wave may not be the main reason for lower mortality. (Table Presented).

2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 22(1): 82, 2022 Feb 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1731518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe polycystic liver disease (PLD), there is a need for new treatments. Estrogens and possibly other female sex hormones stimulate growth in PLD. In some patients, liver volume decreases after menopause. Female sex hormones could therefore be a target for therapy. The AGAINST-PLD study will examine the efficacy of the GnRH agonist leuprorelin, which blocks the production of estrogen and other sex hormones, to reduce liver growth in PLD. METHODS: The AGAINST-PLD study is an investigator-driven, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was received at the University Medical Center of Groningen and will be collected in other sites before opening these sites. Thirty-six female, pre-menopausal patients, with a very large liver volume for age (upper 10% of the PLD population) and ongoing liver growth despite current treatment options will be randomized to direct start of leuprorelin or to 18 months standard of care and delayed start of leuprorelin. Leuprorelin is given as 3.75 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) monthly for the first 3 months followed by 3-monthly depots of 11.25 mg s.c. The trial duration is 36 months. MRI scans to measure liver volume will be performed at screening, 6 months, 18 months, 24 months and 36 months. In addition, blood will be drawn, DEXA-scans will be performed and questionnaires will be collected. This design enables comparison between patients on study treatment and standard of care (first 18 months) and within patients before and during treatment (whole trial). Main outcome is annualized liver growth rate compared between standard of care and study treatment. Secondary outcomes are PLD disease severity, change in liver growth within individuals and (serious) adverse events. The study is designed as a prospective open-label study with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE). DISCUSSION: In this trial, we combined the expertise of hepatologist, nephrologists and gynecologists to study the effect of leuprorelin on liver growth in PLD. In this way, we hope to stop liver growth, reduce symptoms and reduce the need for liver transplantation in severe PLD. Trial registration Eudra CT number 2020-005949-16, registered at 15 Dec 2020. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2020-005949-16 .


Subject(s)
Leuprolide , Liver Diseases , Cysts , Female , Humans , Leuprolide/therapeutic use , Liver Diseases/drug therapy , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Pyridoxal/analogs & derivatives , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
BMC Nephrol ; 23(1): 55, 2022 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1690947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages G4-G5, on dialysis or after kidney transplantation (kidney replacement therapy, KRT). SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials do not elucidate if SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is effective in these patients. Vaccination against other viruses is known to be less effective in kidney patients. Our objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of various types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in patients with CKD stages G4-G5 or on KRT. METHODS: In this national prospective observational cohort study we will follow patients with CKD stages G4-G5 or on KRT (n = 12,000) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination according to the Dutch vaccination program. Blood will be drawn for antibody response measurements at day 28 and month 6 after completion of vaccination. Patient characteristics and outcomes will be extracted from registration data and questionnaires during 2 years of follow-up. Results will be compared with a control group of non-vaccinated patients. The level of antibody response to vaccination will be assessed in subgroups to predict protection against COVID-19 breakthrough infection. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination determined as the incidence of COVID-19 after vaccination. Secondary endpoints are the antibody based immune response at 28 days after vaccination, the durability of this response at 6 months after vaccination, mortality and (serious) adverse events. CONCLUSION: This study will fulfil the lack of knowledge on efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with CKD stages G4-G5 or on KRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered in clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04841785 ). Current knowledge about this subject COVID-19 has devastating impact on patients with CKD stages G4-G5, on dialysis or after kidney transplantation. Effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is very important in these vulnerable patient groups. Recent studies on vaccination in these patient groups are small short-term studies with surrogate endpoints. Contribution of this study Assessment of incidence and course of COVID-19 after various types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during a two-year follow-up period in not only patients on dialysis or kidney transplant recipients, but also in patients with CKD stages G4-G5. Quantitative analysis of antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and its relationship with incidence and course of COVID-19 in patients with CKD stages G4-G5, on dialysis or after kidney transplantation compared with a control group. Monitoring of (serious) adverse events and development of anti-HLA antibodies. Impact on practice or policy Publication of the study design contributes to harmonization of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine study methodology in kidney patients at high-risk for severe COVID-19. Data on efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with CKD will provide guidance for future vaccination policy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , Kidney Transplantation , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Humans , Netherlands , Observational Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
4.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology ; 32:78, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1490195

ABSTRACT

Background: In the general population obesity is associated with increased risk of mortality. However, in ESKD patients obesity is associated with lower risk of mortality, particularly in dialysis patients (i.e. the obesity paradox). In COVID-19 patients, obesity exhibits a similar association with mortality as observed in the non-COVID-19 general population. Given the obesity paradox, we questioned the association of obesity with mortality in ESKD patients with COVID-19. Methods: Data from the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database (ERACODA) were analysed. Association of BMI (kg/m2), divided into: <18.5 (lean), 18.5-24.9 (normal weight), 25-29.9 (overweight), 30-34.9 (obese I) and ≥35 (obese II), with 3-month mortality was investigated using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results were investigated for the total population and, dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients separately. Results: In 3160 ESKD patients (mean age: 65 years, male: 61%), 99 patients were lean, 1151 normal weight (reference group), 1160 overweight, 525 obese I and 225 obese II. During follow-up of 3 months, 28%, 20%, 21%, 23% and 27% of patients died in the lean, normal weight, overweight, obese I and obese II category, respectively. In fully adjusted model, the HRs for 3-month mortality were 1.65 (95% CI:1.10, 2.47), 1.07 (95% CI:0.89, 1.28), 1.17 (95% CI:0.93, 1.46) and 1.71 (95%CI:1.27, 2.30) in lean, overweight, obese I and obese II vs normal weight patients (Figure). Results were similar among dialysis patients and transplant recipients (p-interaction=0.99). Conclusions: In ESKD patients with COVID-19, dialysis patients or kidney transplant recipients, obesity is associated with an increased risk of mortality at 3 months. This is contrary to obesity paradox generally observed in dialysis patients. There is need to investigate why in dialysis patients with COVID-19 the survival benefit of obesity is lost.

5.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology ; 32:85, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1489545

ABSTRACT

Background: Kidney transplant patients are at high risk for COVID-19 related mortality. However, limited data are available on longer term clinical, functional and mental outcomes in patients that survive COVID-19. Methods: Data from adult kidney transplant patients that presented with COVID-19 between February 1st, 2020 and January 31st, 2021 were retrieved from the ERACODA database. Data from patients with complete data for vital status, hospitalization and/or ICU admission was used for this analysis. Results: 912 patients were included with a mean age of 56.7 (±13.7) years. 26.4% were not hospitalized, 57.5% hospitalized, and 16.1% hospitalized and ICU admitted. Three-months survival was 82.3% overall and 98.8%, 84.2% and 49.0% resp. in each group. Three-months acute rejection, need for dialysis / CVVH at any time point, and graft failure occurred in the overall group in 1.0%, 2.6% and 1.8% resp., and in 2.1%, 10.6% and 10.6% of ICU admitted patients resp. Of the surviving patients 83.3% had reached their prior functional status within 3 months. Of patients that had not yet reached their prior functional status, it was expected that 79.6% still would do so within the coming year. 94.4% had reached their prior mental status. Of patients that had not yet reached their prior mental status, it was expected that 80% of patients would do so within the coming year. Conclusions: In patients alive at three-months follow-up, graft loss was rare, and most patients had reached their pre-COVID-19 functional and mental status. Clinical, functional, and mental outcomes in kidney transplant recipients three months after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Data of 487 patients were available for analysis of graft function related outcomes. Data of 450 patients were available for functional and mental status outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL